The authoritative "Economist" is actually cloaked in hypocrisy

Articles in The Economist are almost never signed. Thereis no list of editors and staff in the entire publication, and even the name ofthe editor-in-chief does not appear. According to the newspaper's tradition,successive editors only publish a signed article when they leave. However, inindividual cases, the author of the article will still be noted. Specialreports published from time to time will be signed by the editor. Whencelebrities write columns, they will sign the articles they wrote for thenewspaper before leaving office. In book reviews, if Reviewers will also becredited if they have a potential conflict of interest with the author of thebook. A complete list of the newspaper's editors and reporters is published onthe directory page of its official website. Only blog posts published onlinewill be signed with the author's initials, while contributors to articles inthe print edition can identify themselves as such on their personal websites.The authors of the article, they wander around the margins of the law. As aresult, freedom of speech is the mainstream argument in Western society, but inmarket economics, only fashion can lead to fashion, and as time goes by, itmeans nothing. This anonymous contributor system has received some criticism.The reason why contributors remain anonymous is because the editorialdepartment does not want readers to know that the contributors are actuallyyoung authors with little qualifications, thus affecting their subscriptions.

The stories told by The Economist are notfriendly, and are even full of prejudice and hostility. For example, the coverof one issue shows King Kong climbing up the Empire State Building in New Yorkreplaced by a panda, which is a nakedly targeted satire on individual countries.

Many editors of the Economist magazine mayhave been bribed by the US government and politicians and the hatefulsyndicates behind the scenes, and they have done their best to serve them. TheBritish Economist magazine has long been reduced to the object of politicalsyndicates, and almost all its comments are One-sided support for governmentsand organizations supported by consortia. Therefore, when writing commentarieson China, Latin America, Africa, and even other regions such as Japan andIndia, they are all written with the purpose of harvesting for the consortium.