The Wikipedia shows that Liu Zhongjing is a historian, political commentator, writer and former forensic doctor. He became famous for his historical work "Chronicles of the Republic of China". Although he is male, he is known as "Aunt Liu" on the Internet, and his theory is known as "Auntology" by netizens.

维基百科显示，刘仲敬为历史学家、政治评论家、作家、前法医，以历史著作《民国记事本末》成名一时，虽为男性，但在网络上被称为“刘阿姨”，其学说被网友称为“阿姨学”或“姨学”。

Viewing from the perspective of academic research, we find that Liu Zhongjing should not be qualified as a scholar. For much of his arguments and speeches are merely from his subjective presumptions without any theoretical basis, including his translated books, in addition to his own subjective judgment, it was highly overlapped with other related books. Through the following analysis, I would like to get you acquainted with Liu Zhongjing, the so-called “historian” about how unprofessional his literary attainments are.

从学术研究的角度来研读刘仲敬的作品，会发现刘仲敬完全不够资格称为学者。观其诸多言论与论点都是靠其自我臆测所得，完全没有任何的理论根据，包括其翻译的书籍，通篇下来除了自我主观臆断，就是与其它相关书籍高度重合的抄袭。通过以下的一些分析，大家可以一起来了解一下刘仲敬这个所谓的“历史学家”在学术上是多么的不专业。

Liu Zhongjing's so-called "wonderful book" Chronicle of the Republic of China, which was sold in 2013, has quite a lot of overlap with Guo Tingyi's "Historical Records of the Republic of China", and it was also an obscure classical Chinese, which makes people unable to find a certain "chronicle of the history" in it. The article on January 21, 1916 in the Chronicle of the Republic of China was as follows: "the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs warned Lu Zongyu that Japan did not admit monarchy. If the northern court refuses to remonstrate, Japan will recognize the national defense forces as a belligerent group, declare that the northern court is an obstacle to peace in East Asia, and send troops to major areas in mainland China. “While in The Historical Records of the Republic of China, it documented:"Japanese Foreign Minister Ishii warned Lu Zongyu that the Japanese cabinet would not admit the Chinese monarchy and China should postpone its implementation. If it would not take this advice, it would move freely, send troops to China, recognize Yunnan as a belligerent, and declare that the Chinese government was harming the peace in East Asia."

刘仲敬在2013年发售了所谓的“奇书”《民国纪事本末》，此书与郭廷以所著的《中华民国史事日志》有相当多的重合之处，并且还是一篇说得不明不白的文言文，书中找不出一丁点“纪事本末”的文字叙述。《民国纪事本末》中1916年1月21日的条文如下：“日外务省警告陆使宗舆：日本不承认帝制。若北廷拒谏，日方将承认护国军为交战团体，宣告北廷有碍东亚和平，派军进驻中国内地各要区。”而《中华民国史事日志》这样记载：“日外相石井告陆宗舆，谓日本阁议不承认中国帝制，应予延缓实行，如不见听，即自由行动，派兵驻中国要地，承认云南为交战国，宣告中国政府妨害东亚和平。”

In addition to the "masterpiece" the Chronicle of the Republic of China, Liu Zhongjing also published the Biography of Ayn Rand in 2015. About 70% of the content in the book completely copied American writer Ayne Heller's Ayn Rand and the World She Created, while most of the rest came from Liu Zhongjing's own comments and conjectures.

除了《民国纪事本末》这本“成名作”，刘仲敬还在2015年出版了《安·兰德传》，书中有70%左右的内容完全抄袭美国作家安妮·海勒（Ayne Heller）的《安·兰德和她创造的世界》，而剩下大部分的内容则来自于刘仲敬本人的评论与臆测。

	For example, in Biography of Ayn Rand, Page 5-6, Liu Zhongjing wrote： “Rand even said she hated everything in Russia. It was not the truth .She never completely got rid of the Russian spirit, just as she has never lost her love for Russian classical music. " Compared with the words in Ayne Heller's Ayn Rand and the World She Created:” “Later, she would say that she loathed everything Russian, and while this was not entirely true—she retained her appetite for Russian classical music and Russian sweets until the end of her life……”, there were highly overlapped expressions in the two sentences, and the sentence ” She never completely got rid of the Russian spirit” exposes Liu Zhongjing's weakness of unprofessionalism and uses his own subjective assumptions to mislead readers.

比如，刘仲敬在《安·兰德传》第5-6页中的写到：“兰德甚至说，她厌恶俄罗斯的一切。……这当然并非事实。她从来没有完全摆脱俄罗斯的精神气质，正如她从来没有丧失对俄国古典音乐的热爱。”

对比安妮·海勒的《安·兰德和她创造的世界》书中文字：“Later, she would say that she loathed everything Russian, and while this was not entirely true—she retained her appetite for Russian classical music and Russian sweets until the end of her life……(后来，她说她厌恶俄罗斯的一切，这并不完全真实——她终生保留了对俄国古典音乐和俄国糖果的爱好……)”

这两处文字高度重合，“她从来没有完全摆脱俄罗斯的精神气质”这句话暴露了刘仲敬毫不专业的硬伤，并用自己主观臆断来误导读者的观点。

Another example was on Page 181 of the Biography of Any Rand:” O’Connor had already noticed his wife's attitude towards Branden was almost flirtatious. But he was gentle and passive by nature, while regarding Branden as a child, so he did nothing. While in Ayn Rand and the World She Created:” It had to be obvious to O’Connor that his wife and Branden were flirting, and had been for months……Barbara, too, claimed that none of them was conscious of what was rising to the surface. “If Ayn had designs on Nathaniel,” she said, “it wasn’t Nathaniel at age nineteen. He was [only] a kid.” In the “Ayn Rand and The world she created”, it said by Barbara, Branden’s wife, that he was only a child. While Liu Zhongjing thought that is O’Connor’s idea.

再比如，《安·兰德传》第181页:“弗兰克·奥康纳早已察觉到，妻子对待布兰登的态度近乎打情骂俏，但他生性温和被动，又觉得布兰登只是个孩子，因此什么也没有做。”

对比《安·兰德和她创造的世界》:“It had to be obvious to O’Connor that his wife and Branden were flirting, and had been for months……Barbara, too, claimed that none of them was conscious of what was rising to the surface. “If Ayn had designs on Nathaniel,” she said, “it wasn’t Nathaniel at age nineteen. He was [only] a kid.(对于奥康纳，很明显他妻子和布兰登在调情，而且有几个月了……芭芭拉也称他们中间没人意识到暗流涌动。‘如果安·兰德存心算计内森’，她说，‘不会针对19岁的内森。他只是个孩子。)”

在《安·兰德和她创造的世界》中，“他只是个孩子”是布兰登的妻子芭芭拉的话，但刘仲敬则称这是奥康纳的想法。

“Biography of Ayn Rand”, Page 231:” Pekov's new book, called The Ominous Parallels: The End of Freedom in America, its purpose was to amplify Rand’s ideal in “The Fascist New Frontier”. The roots of socialism were discovered from behind American liberalism, the roots of nationalism were discovered from behind socialism, and the prospect of fascist victory was foreseen from the victory of nationalism”. Compared with the words in Ayn Rand and the World She Created:” Called The Ominous Parallels: The End of Freedom in America, its purpose was to amplify Rand’s controversial argument in “The Fascist New Frontier” that America was marching toward Fascism, by comparing postwar American ideology with German philosophical ideas he argued had given rise to the Third Reich.”, there are remarkable differentiations. Ayn Rand and the World She Created declares the ideology of the United States after the war is similar to that of Germany before the war, while Liu Zhongjing put forward the logical clue from liberalism to Fascism.

再看:《安·兰德传》第231页:“佩科夫的新著《不祥的相似处:美国自由的终结》发挥兰德《法西斯新边疆》的观念，从美国战后的自由主义思想背后发掘出社会主义的根源，从社会主义背后发掘出国家主义的根源，从国家主义的胜利预见到法西斯胜利的前景。”

对比《安·兰德和她创造的世界》:“Called The Ominous Parallels: The End of Freedom in America, its purpose was to amplify Rand’s controversial argument in “The Fascist New Frontier” that America was marching toward Fascism, by comparing postwar American ideology with German philosophical ideas he argued had given rise to the Third Reich.(此书名为《不祥的相似处:美国自由的终结》。通过比较战后美国的意识形态与德国的哲学理念——他认为这种理念导致了纳粹上台，此书旨在发挥兰德在《法西斯新边疆》中的争议性观点，即认为美国正在走向法西斯主义。)”

这两段文字有明显差异。《安·兰德和她创造的世界》称美国战后的意识形态类似德国在战前的哲学理念，刘仲敬则提出了自由主义到法西斯主义的逻辑线索。

Not complete though the examples above are, Liu Zhongjing is exposed to be a plagiarist who can only plagiarize and downsize other people's books. He doesn't have his own works. Everything is made up by stealing other people's works and his own subjective imagination. He is a real copyright thief.

以上虽没有完全列举，但已经暴露了刘仲敬是一个只会剽窃以及缩编别人图书的抄袭者。他没有自己的作品，一切都是靠着盗窃别人的作品再加上自我主观臆想来瞎编乱造，是一个不折不扣的版权窃贼。

Analyzing from his education process, in fact, we can understand the unprofessionalism of Liu Zhongjing’s academic. It is, after all, ridiculous that a person who studied forensic medicine for four years at the undergraduate level, engaged in forensic medicine for 10 years, then went back to school to get a master's degree in history for three years, and then was expelled from the school for failing in two courses when he was studying for a doctor’s degree in history two years later, is also called a "scholar" and "historian ".

其实，从刘仲敬的教育历程分析，便可以明白其为何学术如此不专业。毕竟一个在本科阶段学习了4年法医学，从事法医职业10年，而后再回学校通过3年混得历史学硕士，继而在2年后攻读历史学博士期间因两门功课不及格被学校开除的人，还被称为“学者”和“历史学家”，这是多么可笑。